Sometimes Barack it's not about you!

We have the word of Michelle Obama when it is noted that Barack Obama thinks everything is about him.  Hence, when Hillary remarked about the RFK assignation, Obama piped in that it had no place in this campaign.  Well, actually Obama, the comment was in reference to the timing of the race, as in her reference to JUNE prominently in her comment.  She even emphasized the word June in her comment. I doubt that she was even thinking about you at the time. She was thinking about races going into June. That was what she was talking about.

The very people who lament that our politics is so bad, that they support Obama who claims to want to change politics, these are the same folks who used her comment to impugn her character, as if she were suggesting that Obama could be assassinated.  How disgusting that is!  Hillary Clinton is not suggesting anything like that and to twist what she said into that shows the sick nature of those people who simply must trash Hillary Clinton at every opportunity.

It is the same people who just decry the nature of the political climate, but contribute to that climate at every turn.  Without a doubt, they are using the very tactics that they claim to want to change.  Yeah right.  No, what they want is to use this kind of politics against their political rivals, but insist that no one use the same tactics' against them.

How disturbing that the Obama campaign decided to use this comment in the disgusting way and to interpret it in the most dishonest and insulting way possible.  Trying to imputed Clinton's character but knowing that she did not say that she was hoping or waiting for something bad to happen to Obama, although for me, I never stop hoping for something to happen that illustrates that Obama is not ready to do this job.

The republicans are going to make him the unacceptable candidate by the fall.  They have already done their worst to Clinton for years, no doubt the very accusations spread in liberal circles started in conservative rumor mills and promoted by sleaze balls like Mathews, as if accusations are the same as convictions.

The real truth is that we spent over $50 million on trying to prove some stupid garbage that was never proven, but still is spread by anyone who wants to spread the very hate and innuendo type of politics where you can't possibly mean just what you say and no more, but instead must have your words twisted in such a way as to prove that you are some kind of wacko who thinks (put your insult and lie here).  This is the very kind of politics which has been and is being promoted on such trash TV as Morning Joe, Mathews, Oberfart , and on the conservative side, ORilley, and all Fox rants.

The blogs spread specious lies and rumors, accusations fly all over the place, all designed to make said person some kind of ogre, absolutely unacceptable.  They use insults and twist everything into a most sinister and disturbing personal character assassinations daily, and now trying to make someone seem as if they are wishing for someone to be actually assassinated.  

This is an outrage and it is being perpetrated by press hacks who are allies of Obama, or who outright support him.  But for these people to get away with it, it must be acceptable for the audience.  I find this to be the most ugly part of this subject, because how ever small or large the public is, they seems to be immune to this kind of flagrant disregard for the real truth but insist on distortions and innuendo to sensationalize and destroy any one (Clinton) who they have collectively decided to insult, diminish and demean her character with no more that cursory acknowledgment of the real character of Hillary Clinton and instead daily they attack and impugn her motives, all the while saying that the can't possibly know her motives, but does that stop them?  No! The disgusting thing is that the people who listen to these jerks seem to feed into the lie, being apparently lead around by their very noses.  Can't they smell the rotten nature of their regard and the contents of the shallow and disgusting rhetoric?  Must they always stoop to the most lowest and twisted position or interpretation of some thing in regard to Hillary Clinton?

The women are especially disgusting.  They say such ugly things all the while their mouths twist in such a way as to seem that they are tasting something sour.  Yes, girls, you are tasting something sour, it is not the nature of Clinton's character, but instead it is the nature of your own vitriolic tongue.

When I see the distortion and ugly comments I am reminded that it it the nature of people who think that it is somehow right to insult and attack, without regard to the real truth and the obvious twisting that is going on, not from Clinton, but from her enemies, who think they just must simply find the most distorted interpretation of some comment, and find in it the most lowest thought that they can form, and then paste it on her.  But look where it is coming from, who is doing the interpretation?

Perhaps you are among them?



Display:


Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.00 / 1)

I don't think that Clinton meant anything untoward, but it is absurd to think that Clinton's statement had nothing to do with Obama.  

Obama has more death threats than anyone. I've had lots of people mention the possibility of assassination to me - both Clinton and Obama supporters. And if he were killed, it would shake up the presidential race, just as RFK's death did.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:13:27 PM EST

How do we know has had (2.00 / 1)

more death threats - Hillary or Obama?  Seriously, I hope they both remain safe - but is there any real data on that?  I think people are just asserting it in Obama's favor on the basis of no evidence.  Would the Secret Service actually release such information?


by Molee on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:23:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (2.00 / 1)

He was given SS protection much earlier than normal due to death threats.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:25:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

LOTS of campaigns have gone into JUNE (2.00 / 2)

And I remember lots of campaigns going to the convention.

Why is the O'DRAMA campaign SO DESPERATE TO COVER THAT UP?????


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:27:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No campaign has ever started as early. (2.00 / 1)


by notme54 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:29:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOTS of campaigns have gone into JUNE (2.00 / 1)

Really, dude, you're just making yourself look dumb and propagating a stereotype of Clinton supporters.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:32:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOTS of campaigns have gone into JUNE (2.00 / 1)

Are you wholly oblivious to history?  The 1968 campaign started in March.  When RFK died, they had only completed 13 primaries.

Shit.  Stop trying to "cover up" the truth in the same manner you accuse others.  It makes you either an idiot or a liar.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:03:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOTS of campaigns have gone into JUNE (1.50 / 2)

Can we vote for both "idiot" and "liar"?


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:23:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOTS of campaigns have gone into JUNE (1.00 / 1)

TR'd for namecalling.

And it's: "End the drama, vote Obama."


McCain: because not everyone's ready to say goodbye to W yet!
by Matt Smith on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:41:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (2.00 / 1)

all presidential candidates and senators get secret service protection, so stop playing the victim all the time. But Obama is pretty good at playing the victim.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:28:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Uh, no they don't. (none / 0)

Senators do not get SS protection and candidates can request it, I believe that Sen. McCain has denied his at this point.

I would think that being on Gravel's detail would be somewhat amusing.


by notme54 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:32:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCain took it finally (none / 0)

When he was on the Daily Show, he admitted that he'd taken Secret Service protection finally, when they basically forced him.

Old, rich, white Republican; he could probably go the entire campaign without a bodyguard.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:38:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain took it finally (none / 0)

as long as he has a team of doctors to keep him propped up anyway...


by zerosumgame on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:58:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (none / 0)

Yawn. Yeesh, Tarheal, I figured you'd eventually come out of troll-mode, but go figure.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:33:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (2.00 / 2)

In case you have nit realized that since he openly and unabashedly race-baited in SC much like GWB before him there are many millions like me who are pissed off at this inauthentic, fake, vainglorious man who is running on nothing more than quasi-messianic fervor. People made the mistake of voting for someone much like him in 2000 and they will not repeat I for one will sit this one out if he becomes the nominee using openly sexist and racially divisive tactics.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:45:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (none / 0)

Many millions, eh? Well, I've never met anyone from meatworld who acts like you, sorry, and I've dealt with plenty of supporters from all three sides. If you want to sit it out over some faux outrage, be my guest. Do me a favor, though, and espouse this view as far and wide as possible, so people know how real Clinton supporters act and feel.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:48:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (1.25 / 4)

yeah keep on living in your make believe world! I guess the kool-aid helps.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:54:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How do we know has had (none / 0)

Yep, me and my make-believe world. Like I said, keep using the rhetoric and invective as much as possible, it's already helped Clinton's candidacy innumerably.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:55:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Link? (none / 0)


by Molee on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:33:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Link? (2.00 / 1)

Here's a link showing he got protection much earlier than normal for a candidate due to concerns. The article does say there weren't any direct threats, so if that is accurate I got that part wrong.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:51:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

She's had SS protection (2.00 / 1)

since 1992.  Barack has had the most death threats?  Don't think so.


by wilder on Sat May 24, 2008 at 02:35:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 3)

"democrat voter"

need we say more?



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:13:31 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Wow, I totally missed that.  LOL.


McCain: because not everyone's ready to say goodbye to W yet!
by Matt Smith on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:43:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Democrat Voter? (none / 0)

Wouldn't a real Democrat know that it is properly phrased as "Democratic Voter"? It is only Republicans that have taken to that sort of distasteful and ungrammatical use.


by edg1 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 02:22:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Oh, and the Obama campaign, they've said virtually nothing about the remarks.

Pundits, reporters, and bloggers have said a lot. Not the campaign.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:14:19 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Bill burton's statement, anyone? Go google it.


by Ignored and Disgusted on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:42:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

How could the reaction be more moderate & understated than it was in that statement?

""Sen. Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign," "


McCain just lied again
by wrb on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:01:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

(slaps head, TAB not ENTER fool!)

"Bill Burton said that Clinton's evocation of the assassination "has no place" in the campaign."

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/arch ives/2008/05/get_ready_get_set_parse.php


by zerosumgame on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:02:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

We're still waiting for you to provide the full question in that other thread.  Whats the hold up?



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:04:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (2.00 / 1)

you obviously consider yourself more important then you are. you will have to remind me what thread you mean.

but perhaps you and your feeble friends mean this;

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2 008/05/23/argus_statement/index.html?sou rce=rss&aim=/politic

In the statement, Randell Beck, the executive editor of the Argus Leader, defends Clinton, saying, "The context of the question and answer with Sen. Clinton was whether her continued candidacy jeopardized party unity this close to the Democratic convention. Her reference to Mr. Kennedy's assassination appeared to focus on the timeline of his primary candidacy and not the assassination itself."

But I am sure we will now be besieged by BHO forces to ignore the man behind the curtain, again...


by zerosumgame on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:12:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

This thread.  Where you lied about what question Hillary was trying to answer.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:22:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

Oh, you are also arguing against nobody, since I've already said Hillary meant nothing by her comment other than that races last through June. She did use misleading examples of that though.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:24:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

you will have to point out the 'lie', but you will have to do better then simply screaming about the cropped quote. besides above is how the person doing the interview answered the baseless smear you are promoting.


by zerosumgame on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:31:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you mean this one? DOH (none / 0)

We pointed out the lie in the other thread. Go there and read it if you want.

Hillary was talking about campaigns going into June.  Her examples were misleading.  She was not calling for or hoping for Obama's assassination.  So, again, what baseless smear am I promoting?

You have a serious disconnect.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:36:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.00 / 1)

Actually, I will say more.

How disturbing that the Obama campaign decided to use this comment in the disgusting way and to interpret it in the most dishonest and insulting way possible.  Trying to imputed Clinton's character but knowing that she did not say that she was hoping or waiting for something bad to happen to Obama, although for me, I never stop hoping for something to happen that illustrates that Obama is not ready to do this job.

Back this up or shove it up your ass.  And you'll have to do better than one absolutely tepid statement saying the "remarks were unfortunate".



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:15:51 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

No shove it up yours!


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:59:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Morning Joe? (none / 0)

That's probably the fairest show on MSNBC to both candidates so I would remove that show from your list.


by Blazers Edge on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:18:42 PM EST

It's like you're not even trying (2.00 / 2)

I mean, the hypocricy of ranting about how someone can be unfair and smearing a candidate's good name while unfairly smearing another candidate's good name is pretty staggering, but this is golden:

The women are especially disgusting.  They say such ugly things all the while their mouths twist in such a way as to seem that they are tasting something sour.  Yes, girls, you are tasting something sour, it is not the nature of Clinton's character, but instead it is the nature of your own vitriolic tongue.

I love how people can claim to be pro-Clinton and then spew the most ridiculously sexist crap.

I hope this diary is deleted.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:22:12 PM EST

Re: It's like you're not even trying (none / 0)

It is my opinion that these women commentators are particularly ugly in their comments, often being the ones who say the most sexist things.  Now you may disagree but to say that it has a basis in sexism, which it does not, you don't obviously understand just what sexism is and what is merely observation of these particular women and their comments.

Take a look at their faces!  That is not sexism but reality of their faces and the twisting that goes on.  But of course, their are men who display the same ugly face as well.  Got a mirror?


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:04:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Uh huh. (2.00 / 1)

Slice and dice.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:09:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Please stop (none / 0)

Everyone on both sides... this is just a circular firing squad... let it go.

4000 americans have already died because of our awful, immoral, dishonest president... if we don't come together the next few memorial days may be ever harder on all of us.

We must let it go and remember that like all things, this too will pass


by CaptainMorgan on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:23:59 PM EST

Wrong on so many levels it's hilarious. (none / 0)


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:24:08 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.66 / 3)

How do we know that she wasn't thinking of those times and the threat of her being assassinated? Having a woman as President is almost equally as disruptive as having an African American. This elephant has been in the middle of the living room from Day One.
Let's turn our thoughts back to the thesis of this diary, which is the propensity of Senator Obama, his campaign spokespeople (eg Bill Burton), and lots of his unsophisticated sophomoric supporters to turn every statement Hillary makes and every action Hillary takes as being about him. We're just asking you not to bring her down to your level.
by pan230oh on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:25:20 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.66 / 3)

Another posted caught onto it, to. "Democrat" poster. The "Democrat" party, eh?

How's Rush these days?


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:26:43 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

I happen to be a proud democrat and I never listen to Rush.  I have never voted for any republican, for any election.  You are a jerk.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:07:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The proper terminology is democratic. (none / 0)

Not democrat. Improperly using the word democrat is a republican trait. Grammatically and historically, if you were really a Democrat, you would have chosen "Democratic Voter" as your moniker.


by edg1 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 02:28:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Actually, you're right (2.00 / 1)

This isn't about Obama so why in the world are a lot of the Clinton supporters trying to make it about him?

Senator Clinton screwed up, big time, and a lot of Clinton supporters decide to dump on Senator Obama? It makes no sense and the fact that Sen. Clinton is not responsible for anything in the eyes of some make me sick.

A huge Clinton error is answered with attacks on Obama?

So much for the reality based community.


by notme54 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:28:02 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

The problem with Obama is he is running behind in the popular vote. People don't think he can close the deal anymore so the only way he can gin up support before a primary is play the victim again so the people feel sorry for him and vote for him. I guess as Jerome said if Clinton wins by a huge margin in Puerto Rico as it seems likely then he will become the illegitimate nominee who won the delegates but lost the popular vote. Already he is trying to steal votes in MI and FL. The man has no shame.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:31:45 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

The problem with Clinton is she is running behind in the delegate vote. People don't think she can close the deal anymore so the only way she can gin up support before a primary is play the victim again so the people feel sorry for her and vote for her. I guess as Jerome said if Clinton wins by a huge margin in Puerto Rico as it seems likely then she will become the potential illegitimate nominee who won the popular vote but lost the delegate vote. Already she is trying to steal votes in MI and FL. The woman has no shame.


by notme54 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:35:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

yeah I guess this post is reflective of your candidate much like devoid of original ideas and policies he steal them from others.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:40:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If your posts reflect (none / 0)

the views and temperment of your candidate then, what the hell, I'll agree to that remark.

Should we compare histories?


by notme54 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:44:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Congratulations for feeding the troll, I'm sure he's gleefully regaling this to his buddies over at LGF, or RedState. Not only that, but you managed to propagate a bunch of false claims that even most Clinton supporters eschew. Like why we'd count Puerto Rico and not Iowa, Maine, Washington, Kansas, etc. But heck, if you want to feed the trolls, be my guest. Doesn't reflect poorly on me.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:36:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 2)

If anyone is being divisive around here, it is you. If someone does not like Obama, they are entitled to their opinion. Responding like a militant fascist is not the way to win over supporters for the g.e. Just a thought that you'll probably t.r anyway.


by Ignored and Disgusted on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:44:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Sometimes you need to pay attention to the details= for instance, what political party is Senator Clinton a part of?


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:47:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

Senator Clinton is part of the democratic party, but even though she has received more democratic votes, Obama has received more independent and GOP votes, so I wonder just who is the real representative of the democratic party.  It seems that Clinton has received half of the votes anyway, regardless of the caucus wins, and since Feb. 19th she has received more votes and Obama has not closed in key states, like Ohio, Penn, W.V. and Kentucky, not even winning Indiana, so it seems that Obama is having a hard time closing the deal but is steadily buying the votes needed from the S.D.s.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:23:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Already he is trying to steal votes in MI and FL.

Vaguely curious as to what you think you're talking about


by BlueinColorado on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:43:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

He wants a 50-50 vote split in MI and FL. That is getting votes that he did not win...that is vote stealing.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:57:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Hillary Clinton came in second to "Nobody" in Michigan, but only her votes should count?

She wants to count votes that she earlier said should not be counted, and them compares the solution she called for comparable to slavery and Zimbabwe.

She's completely unethical, and more than a little nuts.


by BlueinColorado on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:00:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

show me a place where she said that the votes should not be counted. She pledged not to campaign in these states and she kept that pledge unlike BO who campaigned in both states either directly or through his surrogates.


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:02:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Not going to count for anything.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:08:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.00 / 2)

and that is why she did not campaign there. Now why did Obama campaign in Fl And MI?


by tarheel74 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:18:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Why not just admit you were wrong about this instead of trying to shift to a different question?



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:27:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

Obama took his own name off the ballot in Michigan and so he is the one who is now saying that the vote wasn't fair because his name wasn't on the ballot?  Seems pretty unethical to me.  As for Clinton, she deserves every vote that voted for her, people cast those votes, and voted for her.  As for unethical, I find your characterization to be wrong, but hate all you wish I'm sure it makes you so happy.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 04:00:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You've crossed the streams! (none / 0)

You've crossed the streams of your whiny spin. Some of the other spinning Clinton tops of delusion are blaming Obama for picking on Hillary by inflating the story.

But we're in complete agreement that this story is all about Hillary and her desperate, quixotic, flailing , scare-the-superdelegates, rage-and-disappointed-entitlement fueled, destroy-the-party, it's-all-about -me, victimization drive over the edge.

Yes, girls, you are tasting something sour

"girls"?


by BlueinColorado on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:42:50 PM EST

Re: You've crossed the streams! (none / 0)

girls referring to those bubble headed sycophants on the TV, who did you think I meant? Surely not Obama supporters who mouth the most enlightened things, NOT!


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:11:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You've crossed the streams! (2.00 / 1)

Your second paragraph pretty much describes the low rent type of vitriolic nonsense that Obama supporters insist on regurgitating.  Sort of reads that way as well.  Ugly stuff you put in your mouth/mind/typing hands.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:35:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

You're tag "democrat voter' makes is SO OBVIOUS you are Republican troll trying to sew division, I don't even know why you bother.

Here's a tip, Democrats refer to the party as "The Democratic Party", so the proper term would be "Democratic voter", the capital D signifying that you are referring to the party, not the general concept of democracy.

Peddle your wares elsewhere, Freeper.


by ArkansasLib on Sat May 24, 2008 at 12:47:26 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (2.00 / 1)

Here's a tip kid, I have been referring to myself as a democrat for more years than you have been alive and I will go on referring to myself as a democrat for many more years God willing.  As for referring to the party, that is a different thing, and in referring to myself I am not referring to the party, jerk!


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:14:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Democrat Voter? (none / 0)

Shouldn't the word be "Democratic?"  Just sayin'...says a lot.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:21:08 PM EST

Re: Democrat Voter? (2.00 / 1)

Proof positive that some people just have to parse everything, as if there is some hidden agenda in me calling myself a democrat.  How absurd.  Just goes to show you this post it true.  Sometimes, it just is exactly what is, and nothing more.

Well EXCUSE ME!!!!


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:30:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democrat Voter? (none / 0)

Touch a nerve?

When you marry the incorrect usage with your BS, makes sense to me.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Sat May 24, 2008 at 01:54:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democrat Voter? (none / 0)

It sounds like a Troll Voter to me.


by edg1 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 02:30:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sexist Pig pens diary. Tries to pass as Democrat. (none / 0)

The women are especially disgusting.  They say such ugly things all the while their mouths twist in such a way

This kind of sexist ranting about women is NOT acceptable on this forum. This is the 21st century. We expect you to treat women with respect.


by edg1 on Sat May 24, 2008 at 02:33:17 PM EST

Re: Sexist Pig pens diary. Tries to pass as Democr (2.00 / 1)

When said women act like ladies instead of hatchet jocks, then they can get some respect, but till then you are not required to defend them nor am I required to respect the unrespectable.  When a woman actually does something that is so much trash talk, then that is exactly what they are trash talkers and I am a woman, jerk, so I know the difference between the pretense of class and actually having some.

The real difference is the fact that you don't see a real reason to have respect for a woman that dedicated her whole life to this country in various positions, but simple minded and other more sinister types are always thinking that their insults elevate them to her status.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  For one thing, you would never hear her talk like these types on the TV or like the small minded trash talkers here and elsewhere on the net.  She has more style than that.  No it is the weaker mind that resorts to insults and sexist rants when none is intended or implied.  So take your fake outrage elsewhere.   I was speaking specifically to the talking heads on your TV that find it so thrilling to insult and degrade but really only proves the degrading within the person doing the degrading and not in the person so being trashed.  Always there are those who set themselves up as judge and jury to someone that they themselves could never even compare to, having accomplished absolutely nothing in their own lives but the insulting of others.  Real gems yeah.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sat May 24, 2008 at 03:52:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (1.00 / 1)

You know, it often in fact IS about Obama...take this election, for instance. He's winning.  He's going to be the nominee. It is mostly about him. Not about semi-literate losers, say, like you.  The fact that you have a thing for Hillary is really important to you, irrelevant to the rest of us.  Change your name to "Democratic Voter" and you'll earn back an ounce of respect.  Otherwise, you're just one more dumb ass with a keyboard, scared of black people, mad at young people, with an overall shitty attitude.  


by PositiveFreedom on Sat May 24, 2008 at 04:26:33 PM EST

Re: Sometimes Barack it's not about you! (none / 0)

Regurgitate this.  You are full of yourself, will be laughing at you this fall when your guy falls to defeat, which if his supporters are any measure, he will most assuridly deserve.  Calling me names will win him no votes, that is for sure.  You just go on doing it, because you are like every other small mind, who hides behind a keyboard and hurls insults at others.  Get a life, grow up, and suck on your own words for awhile.  The semi-literate loser is you.  I will name myself what I wish and trying to trash me because I called myself a democrat is so juvenile.

I am not afraid of black people, what an absurd thing to say.  Just because I find your candidate unqualified to be president has nothing whatsoever to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with his utter lack of qualification.

I have no fear of no respect from someone who gives no respect so deserves none, such as your stupid and childish rantings against my choice of  a name instead of commenting on the real substance of the post.  Just the kind of weak minded trash that comprises some Obama supporters, attack anyone who disagrees with you.  Yeah that really wins over converts to your side.  What a fool you show yourself to be after all.


democrat voter
by democrat voter on Sun May 25, 2008 at 11:17:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.